Head to head · 2026 pitching

Kyle Bradish vs Bubba Chandler

In 2026 Bubba Chandler has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Bradish BAL

Bubba Chandler PIT

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Bradish	Bubba Chandler
G	29	31
GS	29	30
IP	155.0	154.0
W	7	8
SO	142	140
ERA	4.12	4.62
FIP	4.36	4.25
WHIP	1.46	1.40
K/9	8.2	8.2
BB/9	4.1	4.7
FIP−	104	102
WAR	1.5	1.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Bradish	Bubba Chandler
G	96	38
GS	96	34
IP	512.2	185.1
W	26	12
L	29	11
SV	0	1
SO	521	171
BB	185	84
ERA	3.67	4.52
WHIP	1.25	1.32
K/9	9.1	8.3
BB/9	3.2	4.1
HR/9	1.0	0.8
WAR	8.4	2.7

Kyle Bradish’s full profile →Bubba Chandler’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Bradish vs

Bubba Chandler vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.