DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Mitchell Parker vs Tyler Zuber

In 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.3 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMitchell ParkerTyler Zuber
G2244
GS00
IP39.239.2
W32
SO3442
ERA6.585.67
FIP5.475.25
WHIP1.491.44
K/97.79.5
BB/92.92.5
FIP−131125
WAR-0.3-0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
StatisticMitchell ParkerTyler Zuber
G84110
GS590
IP355.1104.1
W193
L297
SV21
SO270115
BB11456
ERA5.196.04
WHIP1.381.56
K/96.89.9
BB/92.94.8
HR/91.32.1
WAR2.2-1.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.