DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Braydon Fisher vs Tim Herrin

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticBraydon FisherTim Herrin
G7567
GS100
IP75.256.2
W33
SO7454
ERA3.213.02
FIP4.394.09
WHIP1.271.31
K/98.88.6
BB/95.24.4
FIP−10598
WAR0.40.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticBraydon FisherTim Herrin
G818
GS00
IP7.015.0
W01
SV00
SO1014
BB47
ERA6.432.40
WHIP1.861.33
K/912.98.4
BB/95.14.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticBraydon FisherTim Herrin
G127219
GS110
IP125.2192.2
W1014
L410
SV10
SO136199
BB6395
ERA3.013.41
WHIP1.171.28
K/99.79.3
BB/94.54.4
HR/90.90.7
WAR1.31.9

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.