Head to head · 2026 pitching

Spencer Arrighetti vs Brandon Williamson

In 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.5 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Spencer Arrighetti HOU

Brandon Williamson CIN

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Spencer Arrighetti	Brandon Williamson
G	24	12
GS	19	9
IP	110.2	52.2
W	9	5
SO	106	36
ERA	4.96	5.30
FIP	5.44	5.89
WHIP	1.38	1.46
K/9	8.6	6.2
BB/9	5.2	5.1
FIP−	130	141
WAR	-0.5	-0.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Spencer Arrighetti	Brandon Williamson
G	60	39
GS	54	35
IP	291.0	184.0
W	17	10
L	27	10
SV	0	0
SO	308	146
BB	149	74
ERA	4.79	4.65
WHIP	1.40	1.32
K/9	9.5	7.1
BB/9	4.6	3.6
HR/9	1.4	1.5
WAR	1.0	0.3

Spencer Arrighetti’s full profile →Brandon Williamson’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Spencer Arrighetti vs

Brandon Williamson vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.