DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Mitch Bratt vs Elmer Rodríguez

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMitch BrattElmer Rodríguez
G106
GS106
IP44.026.2
W10
SO3021
ERA4.705.40
FIP5.134.87
WHIP1.521.57
K/96.17.1
BB/95.55.4
FIP−123116
WAR0.10.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
StatisticMitch BrattElmer Rodríguez
G106
GS106
IP44.026.2
W10
L33
SV00
SO3021
BB2716
ERA4.705.40
WHIP1.521.57
K/96.17.1
BB/95.55.4
HR/91.00.7
WAR0.10.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.