Head to head · 2025 pitching

Jonathan Cannon vs Frankie Montas

In 2025 the two have been worth the same -0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jonathan Cannon CWS

Frankie Montas NYM

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jonathan Cannon	Frankie Montas
G	22	9
GS	17	7
IP	103.2	38.2
W	4	3
SO	86	32
ERA	5.82	6.28
FIP	5.13	5.33
WHIP	1.49	1.60
K/9	7.5	7.4
BB/9	3.3	3.3
FIP−	123	128
WAR	-0.1	-0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Jonathan Cannon	Frankie Montas
G	47	169
GS	38	136
IP	231.0	783.0
W	9	47
L	20	48
SV	2	0
SO	181	792
BB	83	277
ERA	5.14	4.20
WHIP	1.42	1.32
K/9	7.1	9.1
BB/9	3.2	3.2
HR/9	1.4	1.2
WAR	0.5	10.3

Jonathan Cannon’s full profile →Frankie Montas’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jonathan Cannon vs

Frankie Montas vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.