DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series pitching

Hunter Brown vs Sean Burke

In 2026 Sean Burke has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
StatisticHunter BrownSean Burke
G11
GS11
IP0.24.0
W00
SV00
SO28
BB10
ERA40.506.75
WHIP9.001.00
K/927.018.0
BB/913.50.0
Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticHunter BrownSean Burke
G93
GS22
IP17.014.1
W01
SV00
SO1818
BB71
ERA3.183.77
WHIP1.290.70
K/99.511.3
BB/93.70.6

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticHunter BrownSean Burke
G2032
GS2027
IP107.1172.1
W611
SO124185
ERA3.193.34
FIP3.773.63
WHIP1.271.20
K/910.49.7
BB/94.63.2
FIP−9087
WAR1.83.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticHunter BrownSean Burke
G12064
GS11252
IP638.2325.2
W4217
L3518
SV00
SO709340
BB234132
ERA3.443.59
WHIP1.221.29
K/910.09.4
BB/93.33.6
HR/91.01.2
WAR11.63.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.