Head to head · 2025 pitching
Zach Agnos vs Thomas Hatch
In 2025 Zach Agnos has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2025 season
| Statistic | Zach Agnos | Thomas Hatch |
|---|---|---|
| G | 30 | 12 |
| GS | 0 | 1 |
| IP | 31.1 | 34.0 |
| W | 1 | 2 |
| SO | 19 | 22 |
| ERA | 6.61 | 5.82 |
| FIP | 5.62 | 6.02 |
| WHIP | 1.53 | 1.68 |
| K/9 | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| BB/9 | 4.9 | 4.5 |
| FIP− | 135 | 145 |
| WAR | -0.3 | -0.5 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Zach Agnos | Thomas Hatch |
|---|---|---|
| G | — | 2 |
| GS | — | 0 |
| IP | — | 2.0 |
| W | — | 0 |
| SV | — | 0 |
| SO | — | 1 |
| BB | — | 0 |
| ERA | — | 0.00 |
| WHIP | — | 0.00 |
| K/9 | — | 4.5 |
| BB/9 | — | 0.0 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Zach Agnos | Thomas Hatch |
|---|---|---|
| G | 71 | 51 |
| GS | 3 | 7 |
| IP | 122.1 | 103.0 |
| W | 1 | 6 |
| L | 5 | 5 |
| SV | 6 | 0 |
| SO | 77 | 83 |
| BB | 52 | 50 |
| ERA | 6.11 | 5.24 |
| WHIP | 1.51 | 1.59 |
| K/9 | 5.7 | 7.3 |
| BB/9 | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| HR/9 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| WAR | 0.0 | -0.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.