DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Richard Fitts vs Max Scherzer

In 2025 Max Scherzer has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticRichard FittsMax Scherzer
G1117
GS1017
IP45.085.0
W25
SO4082
ERA5.005.19
FIP5.804.99
WHIP1.311.29
K/98.08.7
BB/93.22.4
FIP−140120
WAR-0.30.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticRichard FittsMax Scherzer
G—33
GS—28
IP—157.1
W—8
SV—1
SO—182
BB—62
ERA—3.78
WHIP—1.16
K/9—10.4
BB/9—3.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticRichard FittsMax Scherzer
G15501
GS14492
IP65.23,047.2
W2225
L5126
SV00
SO493,557
BB23814
ERA3.973.29
WHIP1.291.09
K/96.710.5
BB/93.22.4
HR/91.51.1
WAR0.166.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.