Head to head · 2026 pitching
Daniel Palencia vs Jacob Webb
In 2026 Jacob Webb has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Daniel Palencia | Jacob Webb |
|---|---|---|
| G | 32 | 68 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 29.2 | 67.0 |
| W | 2 | 6 |
| SO | 30 | 73 |
| ERA | 3.64 | 3.36 |
| FIP | 4.05 | 4.03 |
| WHIP | 1.21 | 1.25 |
| K/9 | 9.1 | 9.8 |
| BB/9 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| FIP− | 97 | 96 |
| WAR | 0.2 | 0.5 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Daniel Palencia | Jacob Webb |
|---|---|---|
| G | 7 | 9 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| W | 3 | 0 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 5 | 12 |
| BB | 2 | 4 |
| ERA | 3.86 | 9.35 |
| WHIP | 0.86 | 1.96 |
| K/9 | 4.8 | 12.5 |
| BB/9 | 1.9 | 4.2 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Daniel Palencia | Jacob Webb |
|---|---|---|
| G | 123 | 315 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 125.1 | 320.0 |
| W | 8 | 23 |
| L | 12 | 19 |
| SV | 26 | 16 |
| SO | 140 | 317 |
| BB | 53 | 132 |
| ERA | 3.81 | 3.07 |
| WHIP | 1.26 | 1.21 |
| K/9 | 10.1 | 8.9 |
| BB/9 | 3.8 | 3.7 |
| HR/9 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| WAR | 1.6 | 2.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.