DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Logan Henderson vs Brandon Woodruff

In 2026 Logan Henderson has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticLogan HendersonBrandon Woodruff
G189
GS189
IP98.145.1
W112
SO11047
ERA2.472.98
FIP3.333.19
WHIP0.840.84
K/910.19.3
BB/91.72.0
FIP−8076
WAR2.21.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticLogan HendersonBrandon Woodruff
G39
GS34
IP12.029.1
W01
SV00
SO1041
BB64
ERA4.503.38
WHIP1.170.89
K/97.512.6
BB/94.51.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticLogan HendersonBrandon Woodruff
G23151
GS23136
IP123.2790.1
W1455
L330
SV01
SO143918
BB27200
ERA2.333.10
WHIP0.871.02
K/910.410.5
BB/92.02.3
HR/91.21.0
WAR2.819.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.