DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 ALDS pitching

Parker Messick vs Grant Taylor

In 2026 Parker Messick has been worth 2.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
StatisticParker MessickGrant Taylor
G24
GS20
IP6.26.1
W00
SV02
SO116
BB64
ERA5.405.68
WHIP1.801.74
K/914.88.5
BB/98.15.7
Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticParker MessickGrant Taylor
G45
GS40
IP13.28.2
W00
SV02
SO1711
BB105
ERA3.954.15
WHIP1.981.62
K/911.211.4
BB/96.65.2

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticParker MessickGrant Taylor
G3260
GS324
IP186.184.0
W127
SO193106
ERA2.562.25
FIP3.072.77
WHIP1.061.07
K/99.311.4
BB/92.43.2
FIP−7366
WAR4.71.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticParker MessickGrant Taylor
G3996
GS396
IP226.0120.2
W159
L107
SV016
SO231160
BB5545
ERA2.593.06
WHIP1.111.18
K/99.211.9
BB/92.23.4
HR/90.80.5
WAR5.83.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.