Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting
Chase DeLauter vs Victor Mesa Jr.
In 2026 Chase DeLauter has been worth 1.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 6 |
| PA | 26 | 23 |
| H | 8 | 2 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 4 | 0 |
| BB | 4 | 2 |
| SO | 4 | 8 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .364 | .095 |
| OBP | .462 | .174 |
| SLG | .636 | .095 |
| OPS | 1.098 | .269 |
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 13 | 14 |
| PA | 55 | 48 |
| H | 14 | 6 |
| HR | 1 | 1 |
| RBI | 6 | 2 |
| BB | 7 | 5 |
| SO | 5 | 17 |
| SB | 0 | 2 |
| AVG | .292 | .140 |
| OBP | .382 | .229 |
| SLG | .417 | .209 |
| OPS | .798 | .438 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 133 | 74 |
| PA | 559 | 262 |
| H | 142 | 60 |
| HR | 16 | 14 |
| RBI | 67 | 34 |
| SB | 11 | 9 |
| AVG | .287 | .255 |
| OBP | .363 | .323 |
| SLG | .457 | .489 |
| OPS | .820 | .812 |
| ISO | .170 | .234 |
| BB% | 10.7% | 8.8% |
| K% | 14.7% | 20.2% |
| wOBA | .361 | .352 |
| wRC+ | 128 | 123 |
| WAR | 3.0 | 1.4 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 133 | 88 |
| PA | 559 | 300 |
| H | 142 | 66 |
| 2B | 30 | 9 |
| 3B | 3 | 3 |
| HR | 16 | 15 |
| RBI | 67 | 40 |
| BB | 60 | 28 |
| SO | 82 | 58 |
| SB | 11 | 9 |
| AVG | .287 | .247 |
| SLG | .457 | .472 |
| WAR | 3.0 | 1.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

