DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Mitch Farris vs Charlie Morton

In 2025 Charlie Morton has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMitch FarrisCharlie Morton
G533
GS527
IP24.1142.0
W19
SO24149
ERA6.665.83
FIP4.784.96
WHIP1.441.58
K/98.99.4
BB/94.14.6
FIP−115119
WAR0.10.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
StatisticMitch FarrisCharlie Morton
G35281
GS5275
IP77.21,521.0
W2111
L673
SV10
SO811,681
BB36571
ERA4.753.95
WHIP1.471.26
K/99.49.9
BB/94.23.4
HR/91.51.0
WAR0.125.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.