
Players · R · C · 2010 regular season
Mike Redmond
- Age
- 39
- B/T
- R/R
- Height
- 5' 11"
- Weight
- 200 lb
- Number
- #52
- Born
- May 5, 1971 in Seattle, WA, United States
- MLB debut
- May 31, 1998
- dbWAR
- 1.5 Regular season, 2005–2010 only
- PA
- 68
- AVG
- .206
- OBP
- .242
- SLG
- .270
- wRC+
- 37 100 = avg
Mike Redmond was a catcher for the Cleveland Indians. In 2010 he hit 0 home runs and knocked in 5 RBIs, notching 13 hits across 68 plate appearances in 20 games. His batting average was .206, 19.8% lower than the league average of .257. He reached base at a .242 clip and slugged .270, for an OPS of .512, 29.7% lower than the league mark of .728. He made contact on 86.2% of his swings. Adjusted for his ballpark and league, his 37 wRC+ puts his offence 63% below average. That comes to -0.2 dbWAR — -4.9 runs with the bat, +0.1 for the ballpark, -0.0 on the bases, -0.4 on double plays, +1.2 for the position he plays, against replacement level. It includes no fielding: defensive runs are proprietary and are not estimated here, so the figure credits playing a demanding position but not playing it well.
League context
Percentile among qualified batters, 2010 regular season.
How the WAR is built
Runs above replacement, 2010. These terms sum to -2.2 runs, divided by runs-per-win to give WAR. There is no fielding term.
WAR by season
Batting Regular season
Standard and advanced, by season. Regular-season games only. Seasons on file run 2005–2010; his career began in 1998, and earlier seasons are not in this data yet.
| Trend | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | CLE | 20 | 68 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 10 | .206 | .242 | .270 | .063 | .245 | 2.9% | 14.7% | .234 | -4.9 | 37 | -0.2 | |
| 2009 | MIN | 44 | 147 | 32 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 19 | .237 | .299 | .289 | .052 | .276 | 7.5% | 12.9% | .273 | -7.2 | 58 | -0.2 | |
| 2008 | MIN | 38 | 137 | 37 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 11 | .287 | .321 | .333 | .047 | .311 | 3.6% | 8.0% | .297 | -4.1 | 78 | 0.1 | |
| 2007 | MIN | 81 | 298 | 80 | 1 | 38 | 0 | 18 | 23 | .294 | .346 | .353 | .059 | .315 | 6.0% | 7.7% | .315 | -5.3 | 89 | 0.5 | |
| 2006 | MIN | 46 | 190 | 61 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 4 | 18 | .341 | .365 | .413 | .073 | .374 | 2.1% | 9.5% | .346 | +1.4 | 107 | 0.9 | |
| 2005 | MIN | 45 | 159 | 46 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 6 | 14 | .311 | .350 | .392 | .081 | .338 | 3.8% | 8.8% | .333 | +0.3 | 101 | 0.6 |
Platoon splits
How he hits left- and right-handed pitching.
| Split | PA | AB | H | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs LHP | 12 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .250 | .250 | .333 | .258 | 0.0% |
| vs RHP | 56 | 51 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 10 | .196 | .241 | .255 | .229 | 17.9% |
Spray chart
Where every ball he put in play landed, 2010.
Loading 52 batted balls…
Hot and cold zones
Batting average by pitch location, 2010.
Situational hitting
How Mike Redmond hits by base state, outs, score and late-game pressure — each read against his own season line.
| Situation | PA | AB | H | HR | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All situations | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | .206 | .242 | .270 | .234 |
| Bases empty | 33 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .161 | .212 | .226 | .204 |
| Runner on first · thin | 14 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | .308 | .308 | .385 | .307 |
| Runners on | 35 | 32 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | .250 | .273 | .313 | .264 |
| RISP · thin | 21 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | .211 | .250 | .263 | .237 |
Runners on includes runners in scoring position, which is the convention every reference uses. Rows under 25 plate appearances are marked thin — at that size a rate moves several dozen points on one hit. Counted from play-by-play, 2010.
Not in the 2010 data: exit velocity and launch angle, first recorded in 2015. The play-by-play goes back to 2005, but the measurements on each pitch and batted ball arrived later, so the panels built from them are left off this season.
Compare Mike Redmond with…
Side by side with up to three others.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season's own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page.