C · 2018
Adam Moore
- Age
- 34
- B/T
- R/R
- Height
- 6' 3"
- Weight
- 220 lb
- Number
- #10
- Born
- May 8, 1984 in Longview, TX, USA
- MLB debut
- September 17, 2009
- dbWAR
- -.0 3 season(s)
- PA
- 20
- AVG
- .222
- OBP
- .263
- SLG
- .444
- wRC+
- 92 100 = avg
Adam Moore is a catcher for the Tampa Bay Rays. In 2018 he hit 1 home run and knocked in 2 RBIs, notching 4 hits across 20 plate appearances in 6 games. His batting average was .222, 10.4% lower than the league average of .248. He reached base at a .263 clip and slugged .444, for an OPS of .708, 2.7% lower than the league mark of .728. He averaged 89.7 mph off the bat, hit 50.0% of balls in play at 95 mph or better, barrelled 25.0% of them and made contact on 51.3% of his swings. Adjusted for his ballpark and league, his 92 wRC+ puts his offence 8% below average. That comes to 0.1 dbWAR — -0.2 runs with the bat, -0.0 on the bases, +0.4 for the position he plays, against replacement level. It includes no fielding: defensive runs are proprietary and are not estimated here, so the figure credits playing a demanding position but not playing it well.
League context
Percentile among qualified batters, 2018.
How the WAR is built
Runs above replacement, 2018. These four terms sum to +0.9 runs, divided by runs-per-win to give WAR.
WAR by season
Batting
Standard and advanced, by season.
| Trend | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 6 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | .222 | .263 | .444 | .222 | .300 | 5.0% | 35.0% | .304 | -0.2 | 92 | 0.1 | |
| 2016 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0% | 80.0% | .000 | -1.3 | -111 | -0.1 | |
| 2015 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | .250 | .250 | .250 | .000 | .500 | 0.0% | 50.0% | .220 | -0.3 | 30 | -0.0 |
Platoon splits
How he hits left- and right-handed pitching.
| Split | PA | AB | H | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs LHP | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .333 | .500 | 1.333 | .687 | 0.0% |
| vs RHP | 16 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | .200 | .200 | .267 | .202 | 43.8% |
Spray chart
Where every ball he put in play landed, 2018.
Loading 10 batted balls…
Contact quality
How hard and at what angle he hits it, over 8 tracked batted balls in 2018. Percentiles are against qualified batters.
- Barrel rate
- 25.0% 2 barrels
- Exit velocity
- 89.7 mph average
- Max exit velo
- 106.0 mph, hardest hit
- Hard hit
- 50.0% 95 mph or better
- Sweet spot
- 37.5% 8–32° launch
- Launch angle
- 8.3° average
A barrel is a batted ball whose exit velocity and launch angle have historically produced at least a .500 average and 1.500 slugging — 98 mph within 26–30°, widening to 8–50° by 116 mph. Reconstructed from Statcast's published anchor points, which reproduces them exactly; the interior is within a degree. Sweet spot (8–32°) is an exact definition.
Hot and cold zones
Batting average by pitch location, 2018.
Situational hitting
How Adam Moore hits by base state, outs, score and late-game pressure — each read against his own season line.
| Situation | PA | AB | H | HR | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All situations | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | .222 | .263 | .444 | .304 |
| Bases empty · thin | 13 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | .231 | .231 | .538 | .323 |
| Runner on first · thin | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 |
| Runners on · thin | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .200 | .333 | .200 | .264 |
| RISP · thin | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .250 | .400 | .250 | .317 |
Runners on includes runners in scoring position, which is the convention every reference uses. Rows under 25 plate appearances are marked thin — at that size a rate moves several dozen points on one hit. Counted from play-by-play, 2018.
Head to head
Put Adam Moore beside up to three others.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season's own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page.