
Players · R · Pitcher · 2006 regular season
Davis Romero
- Age
- 23
- B/T
- L/L
- Height
- 5' 10"
- Weight
- 185 lb
- Number
- #50
- Born
- March 30, 1983 in Aguadulce, Panama
- MLB debut
- August 18, 2006
- dbWAR
- .2 Regular season, 1 season(s)
- IP
- 16.1
- ERA
- 3.86
- FIP
- 4.00
- K/9
- 5.5
- FIP−
- 88 100 = avg
Davis Romero was a relief pitcher for the Toronto Blue Jays. In 2006 he struck out 10 batters over 16.1 innings across 7 appearances, going 1-0. His ERA of 3.86 was 14.8% lower than the league average of 4.53. Stripping out defence, his 4.00 FIP suggests the ERA was no fluke. He missed bats on 11.2% of swings (4.5% of every pitch he threw), walked 8.5% of the batters he faced and struck out 14.1%. His 0.2 dbWAR is built from that FIP rather than runs allowed, so it credits him for what he controls and not for the defence behind him.
League context
Percentile among qualified pitchers, 2006 regular season.
Pitching Regular season
Standard and advanced, by season. Regular-season games only.
| Trend | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | TOR | 7 | 0 | 16.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 3.86 | 4.00 | 1.53 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 85 | 88 | 0.2 | — |
Platoon splits
How left- and right-handed hitters fare against him.
| Split | PA | AB | H | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs LHB | 23 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | .318 | .348 | .364 | .302 | 17.4% |
| vs RHB | 48 | 42 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 6 | .286 | .375 | .452 | .369 | 12.5% |
Not in the 2006 data: pitch types, recorded in every park from 2008. The play-by-play goes back to 2005, but the measurements on each pitch and batted ball arrived later, so the panels built from them are left off this season.
Compare Davis Romero with…
Side by side with up to three others.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season's own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page.