Pitcher · 2016
Scott Diamond
- Age
- 30
- B/T
- L/L
- Height
- 6' 3"
- Weight
- 205 lb
- Number
- #58
- Born
- July 30, 1986 in Guelph, ON, Canada
- MLB debut
- July 18, 2011
- dbWAR
- -.1 1 season(s)
- IP
- 1.0
- ERA
- 27.00
- FIP
- 9.15
- K/9
- 0.0
- FIP−
- 218 100 = avg
Scott Diamond is a relief pitcher for the Toronto Blue Jays. In 2016 he struck out 0 batters over 1.0 inning across 1 appearance, going 0-0. His ERA of 27.00 was 544.4% higher than the league average of 4.19. Stripping out defence, his 9.15 FIP suggests he pitched better than his ERA shows. He missed bats on 10.0% of swings (3.8% of every pitch he threw), walked 28.6% of the batters he faced and struck out 0.0%. His -0.1 dbWAR is built from that FIP rather than runs allowed, so it credits him for what he controls and not for the defence behind him.
League context
Percentile among qualified pitchers, 2016.
Pitching
Standard and advanced, by season.
| Trend | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 27.00 | 9.15 | 4.00 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 644 | 218 | -0.1 | — |
Platoon splits
How left- and right-handed hitters fare against him.
| Split | PA | AB | H | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs LHB | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .000 | .500 | .000 | .349 | 0.0% |
| vs RHB | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .500 | .600 | .750 | .568 | 0.0% |
Pitch sequencing
What Scott Diamond throws in each count, and what he follows each pitch with. Select any cell for the breakdown.
Select a count to see exactly what Scott Diamond throws in it.
Pitch arsenal
What he throws, how hard, and how often it misses in 2016.
| Four-Seam Fastball | 18 | 88.4 | 1,708 | 38.9% | 12.5% |
Head to head
Put Scott Diamond beside up to three others.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season's own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page.