DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · Career pitching

Cole Hamels vs Zack Wheeler

In 2020 Zack Wheeler has been worth 1.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticCole HamelsZack Wheeler
G423311
GS422311
IP2,698.01,890.1
W163127
L12280
SV00
SO2,5602,013
BB767537
ERA3.433.26
WHIP1.181.13
K/98.59.6
BB/92.62.6
HR/91.00.9
WAR47.341.3

2020 season

2020 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticCole HamelsZack Wheeler
G111
GS111
IP3.171.0
W04
SO253
ERA8.102.92
FIP2.893.22
WHIP1.201.17
K/95.46.7
BB/92.72.0
FIP−6572
WAR0.11.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticCole HamelsZack Wheeler
G1713
GS1611
IP100.174.1
W74
SV00
SO9380
BB2717
ERA3.412.30
WHIP1.100.77
K/98.39.7
BB/92.42.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.