DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · Career pitching

Madison Bumgarner vs Cole Hamels

In 2020 Cole Hamels has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticMadison BumgarnerCole Hamels
G358423
GS355422
IP2,209.12,698.0
W134163
L124122
SV00
SO2,0702,560
BB544767
ERA3.473.43
WHIP1.151.18
K/98.48.5
BB/92.22.6
HR/91.11.0
WAR36.447.3

2020 season

2020 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMadison BumgarnerCole Hamels
G91
GS91
IP41.23.1
W10
SO302
ERA6.488.10
FIP7.182.89
WHIP1.441.20
K/96.55.4
BB/92.82.7
FIP−16165
WAR-0.70.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticMadison BumgarnerCole Hamels
G1617
GS1416
IP102.1100.1
W87
SV10
SO8793
BB1827
ERA2.113.41
WHIP0.901.10
K/97.78.3
BB/91.62.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.