Head to head · 2024 pitching

Matt Moore vs Tanner Rainey

In 2024 Tanner Rainey has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Moore LAA

Tanner Rainey WSH

2024 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Moore	Tanner Rainey
G	51	50
GS	0	0
IP	48.1	51.0
W	5	0
SO	41	44
ERA	5.03	4.76
FIP	6.17	5.42
WHIP	1.34	1.49
K/9	7.6	7.8
BB/9	4.8	5.1
FIP−	151	133
WAR	-0.9	-0.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Moore	Tanner Rainey
G	306	217
GS	103	0
IP	795.2	206.0
W	42	5
L	49	11
SV	6	15
SO	714	253
BB	321	142
ERA	4.76	5.46
WHIP	1.41	1.50
K/9	8.1	11.1
BB/9	3.6	6.2
HR/9	1.3	1.4
WAR	4.2	-0.7

Matt Moore’s full profile →Tanner Rainey’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Moore vs

Tanner Rainey vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.