Head to head · 2025 pitching

Gerson Garabito vs Tanner Rainey

In 2025 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Gerson Garabito TEX

Tanner Rainey PIT

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Gerson Garabito	Tanner Rainey
G	3	13
GS	0	0
IP	8.0	9.2
W	0	0
SO	8	11
ERA	9.00	11.17
FIP	3.89	3.96
WHIP	2.00	1.76
K/9	9.0	10.2
BB/9	1.1	8.4
FIP−	93	95
WAR	0.1	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Gerson Garabito	Tanner Rainey
G	21	217
GS	2	0
IP	34.1	206.0
W	0	5
L	2	11
SV	0	15
SO	30	253
BB	13	142
ERA	5.77	5.46
WHIP	1.49	1.50
K/9	7.9	11.1
BB/9	3.4	6.2
HR/9	1.3	1.4
WAR	-0.2	-0.7

Gerson Garabito’s full profile →Tanner Rainey’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Gerson Garabito vs

Tanner Rainey vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.