DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Nathan Eovaldi vs Bryce Miller

In 2026 Nathan Eovaldi has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticNathan EovaldiBryce Miller
G2722
GS2321
IP145.2118.2
W114
SO144119
ERA4.204.17
FIP4.194.41
WHIP1.221.16
K/98.99.0
BB/92.22.9
FIP−100105
WAR1.51.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticNathan EovaldiBryce Miller
G173
GS123
IP79.214.1
W91
SV00
SO829
BB185
ERA3.052.51
WHIP1.041.05
K/99.35.7
BB/92.03.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticNathan EovaldiBryce Miller
G34396
GS32095
IP1,848.0520.2
W11328
L9431
SV00
SO1,631483
BB501143
ERA3.924.04
WHIP1.251.14
K/97.98.3
BB/92.42.5
HR/91.01.3
WAR28.75.9

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.