Head to head · 2026 pitching

Nathan Eovaldi vs Kyle Harrison

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.5 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Nathan Eovaldi TEX

Kyle Harrison MIL

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nathan Eovaldi	Kyle Harrison
G	27	28
GS	23	24
IP	145.2	115.2
W	11	11
SO	144	141
ERA	4.20	4.59
FIP	4.19	4.03
WHIP	1.22	1.35
K/9	8.9	11.0
BB/9	2.2	2.8
FIP−	100	96
WAR	1.5	1.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Nathan Eovaldi	Kyle Harrison
G	260	70
GS	241	61
IP	1,388.0	310.1
W	98	20
L	59	14
SV	0	0
SO	1,310	332
BB	351	103
ERA	3.86	4.47
WHIP	1.20	1.33
K/9	8.5	9.6
BB/9	2.3	3.0
HR/9	1.2	1.5
WAR	22.5	3.0

Nathan Eovaldi’s full profile →Kyle Harrison’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nathan Eovaldi vs

Kyle Harrison vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.