Head to head · Career batting

Bryce Harper vs Christian Yelich

In 2026 Bryce Harper has been worth 4.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2025, by dbWAR.

Bryce Harper PHI

Christian Yelich MIL

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Christian Yelich
G	1,946	1,731
PA	8,358	7,527
H	1,956	1,845
2B	433	350
3B	27	37
HR	392	245
RBI	1,138	910
BB	1,212	883
SO	1,802	1,683
SB	159	232
AVG	.279	.282
SLG	.516	.459
WAR	63.4	48.5

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Christian Yelich
G	161	117
PA	693	500
H	155	104
HR	29	12
RBI	87	59
SB	7	11
AVG	.269	.235
OBP	.380	.315
SLG	.485	.378
OPS	.865	.692
ISO	.217	.143
BB%	15.4%	9.8%
K%	21.4%	27.0%
wOBA	.378	.307
wRC+	136	92
WAR	4.3	0.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Christian Yelich
G	60	39
PA	263	170
H	60	33
HR	18	2
RBI	36	8
BB	38	26
SO	61	39
SB	8	9
AVG	.271	.232
OBP	.382	.359
SLG	.593	.324
OPS	.974	.683

Bryce Harper’s full profile →Christian Yelich’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Bryce Harper vs

Christian Yelich vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.