Head to head · 2026 batting

Bryce Harper vs Seiya Suzuki

In 2026 Bryce Harper has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Bryce Harper PHI

Seiya Suzuki CHC

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Seiya Suzuki
G	161	143
PA	693	634
H	155	147
HR	29	26
RBI	87	86
SB	7	3
AVG	.269	.270
OBP	.380	.368
SLG	.485	.473
OPS	.865	.841
ISO	.217	.204
BB%	15.4%	12.8%
K%	21.4%	24.4%
wOBA	.378	.368
wRC+	136	134
WAR	4.3	3.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Seiya Suzuki
G	60	10
PA	263	40
H	60	9
HR	18	3
RBI	36	5
BB	38	2
SO	61	12
SB	8	0
AVG	.271	.237
OBP	.382	.275
SLG	.593	.553
OPS	.974	.828

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Seiya Suzuki
G	1,946	673
PA	8,358	2,899
H	1,956	683
2B	433	142
3B	27	18
HR	392	113
RBI	1,138	382
BB	1,212	316
SO	1,802	719
SB	159	39
AVG	.279	.269
SLG	.516	.472
WAR	63.4	15.4

Bryce Harper’s full profile →Seiya Suzuki’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Bryce Harper vs

Seiya Suzuki vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.