Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Seiya Suzuki

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Teammates: two of the 3 most valuable hitters on the 2026 Chicago Cubs.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Seiya Suzuki CHC

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Seiya Suzuki
G	162	143
PA	726	634
H	175	147
HR	45	26
RBI	107	86
SB	41	3
AVG	.280	.270
OBP	.372	.368
SLG	.570	.473
OPS	.943	.841
ISO	.291	.204
BB%	11.4%	12.8%
K%	25.8%	24.4%
wOBA	.402	.368
wRC+	157	134
WAR	8.7	3.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Seiya Suzuki
G	10	10
PA	37	40
H	5	9
HR	0	3
RBI	3	5
BB	2	2
SO	16	12
SB	2	0
AVG	.147	.237
OBP	.194	.275
SLG	.147	.553
OPS	.342	.828

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Seiya Suzuki
G	448	673
PA	1,802	2,899
H	409	683
2B	81	142
3B	18	18
HR	86	113
RBI	250	382
BB	136	316
SO	447	719
SB	105	39
AVG	.255	.269
SLG	.489	.472
WAR	13.6	15.4

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Seiya Suzuki’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Seiya Suzuki vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.