Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Jackson Merrill

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 5.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Jackson Merrill SD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Jackson Merrill
G	2	2
PA	8	8
H	0	4
HR	0	0
RBI	0	2
BB	1	1
SO	4	2
SB	1	1
AVG	.000	.571
OBP	.125	.625
SLG	.000	.571
OPS	.125	1.196

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Jackson Merrill
G	10	16
PA	37	64
H	5	16
HR	0	2
RBI	3	9
BB	2	5
SO	16	16
SB	2	2
AVG	.147	.281
OBP	.194	.333
SLG	.147	.474
OPS	.342	.807

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Jackson Merrill
G	162	157
PA	726	664
H	175	156
HR	45	26
RBI	107	87
SB	41	27
AVG	.280	.254
OBP	.372	.303
SLG	.570	.440
OPS	.943	.743
ISO	.291	.186
BB%	11.4%	6.2%
K%	25.8%	24.1%
wOBA	.402	.322
wRC+	157	106
WAR	8.7	3.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Jackson Merrill
G	448	425
PA	1,802	1,740
H	409	434
2B	81	82
3B	18	17
HR	86	66
RBI	250	244
BB	136	103
SO	447	369
SB	105	44
AVG	.255	.270
SLG	.489	.465
WAR	13.6	11.3

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Jackson Merrill’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Jackson Merrill vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.