Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Elly De La Cruz

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 2.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Elly De La Cruz CIN

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Elly De La Cruz
G	162	143
PA	726	636
H	175	158
HR	45	30
RBI	107	79
SB	41	30
AVG	.280	.283
OBP	.372	.365
SLG	.570	.515
OPS	.943	.880
ISO	.291	.233
BB%	11.4%	11.3%
K%	25.8%	27.5%
wOBA	.402	.382
wRC+	157	148
WAR	8.7	6.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Elly De La Cruz
G	448	563
PA	1,802	2,458
H	409	575
2B	81	112
3B	18	29
HR	86	90
RBI	250	285
BB	136	243
SO	447	718
SB	105	169
AVG	.255	.262
SLG	.489	.463
WAR	13.6	19.5

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Elly De La Cruz’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Elly De La Cruz vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.