Head to head · 2026 batting

Yordan Alvarez vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2026 by dbWAR.

Yordan Alvarez HOU

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Yordan Alvarez	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	158	162
PA	692	726
H	179	175
HR	42	45
RBI	106	107
SB	1	41
AVG	.316	.280
OBP	.432	.372
SLG	.601	.570
OPS	1.033	.943
ISO	.286	.291
BB%	15.8%	11.4%
K%	17.3%	25.8%
wOBA	.430	.402
wRC+	182	157
WAR	7.5	8.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Yordan Alvarez	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	62	10
PA	260	37
H	64	5
HR	12	0
RBI	41	3
BB	31	2
SO	71	16
SB	0	2
AVG	.288	.147
OBP	.385	.194
SLG	.536	.147
OPS	.921	.342

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Yordan Alvarez	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	835	448
PA	3,559	1,802
H	907	409
2B	190	81
3B	7	18
HR	212	86
RBI	599	250
BB	455	136
SO	686	447
SB	10	105
AVG	.300	.255
SLG	.578	.489
WAR	31.9	13.6

Yordan Alvarez’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Yordan Alvarez vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.