Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Kevin McGonigle

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 2.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Kevin McGonigle DET

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Kevin McGonigle
G	162	156
PA	726	707
H	175	168
HR	45	18
RBI	107	72
SB	41	12
AVG	.280	.278
OBP	.372	.376
SLG	.570	.430
OPS	.943	.806
ISO	.291	.152
BB%	11.4%	13.4%
K%	25.8%	14.1%
wOBA	.402	.361
wRC+	157	132
WAR	8.7	5.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Kevin McGonigle
G	448	156
PA	1,802	707
H	409	168
2B	81	28
3B	18	5
HR	86	18
RBI	250	72
BB	136	95
SO	447	100
SB	105	12
AVG	.255	.278
SLG	.489	.430
WAR	13.6	5.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Kevin McGonigle’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Kevin McGonigle vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.