Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Ty France

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 5.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 Wild Card Series, where the San Diego Padres won 2-0 over the Chicago Cubs.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Ty France SD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Ty France
G	2	2
PA	8	8
H	0	4
HR	0	0
RBI	0	0
BB	1	0
SO	4	1
SB	1	0
AVG	.000	.500
OBP	.125	.500
SLG	.000	.625
OPS	.125	1.125

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Ty France
G	10	13
PA	37	56
H	5	14
HR	0	0
RBI	3	5
BB	2	2
SO	16	11
SB	2	0
AVG	.147	.269
OBP	.194	.321
SLG	.147	.308
OPS	.342	.629

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Ty France
G	162	128
PA	726	500
H	175	130
HR	45	21
RBI	107	72
SB	41	1
AVG	.280	.295
OBP	.372	.363
SLG	.570	.502
OPS	.943	.865
ISO	.291	.207
BB%	11.4%	7.4%
K%	25.8%	21.6%
wOBA	.402	.375
wRC+	157	145
WAR	8.7	3.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Ty France
G	448	965
PA	1,802	3,809
H	409	906
2B	81	181
3B	18	6
HR	86	102
RBI	250	436
BB	136	241
SO	447	708
SB	105	4
AVG	.255	.267
SLG	.489	.414
WAR	13.6	10.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Ty France’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Ty France vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.