Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Jackson Chourio vs Ty France
In 2026 Jackson Chourio has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Ty France |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 19 | 17 |
| H | 3 | 3 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 6 | 2 |
| BB | 1 | 1 |
| SO | 1 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .188 | .214 |
| OBP | .263 | .353 |
| SLG | .375 | .214 |
| OPS | .638 | .567 |
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Ty France |
|---|---|---|
| G | 25 | 13 |
| PA | 109 | 56 |
| H | 32 | 14 |
| HR | 6 | 0 |
| RBI | 20 | 5 |
| BB | 3 | 2 |
| SO | 23 | 11 |
| SB | 4 | 0 |
| AVG | .311 | .269 |
| OBP | .330 | .321 |
| SLG | .534 | .308 |
| OPS | .864 | .629 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Ty France |
|---|---|---|
| G | 127 | 128 |
| PA | 573 | 500 |
| H | 152 | 130 |
| HR | 25 | 21 |
| RBI | 75 | 72 |
| SB | 23 | 1 |
| AVG | .291 | .295 |
| OBP | .351 | .363 |
| SLG | .487 | .502 |
| OPS | .837 | .865 |
| ISO | .195 | .207 |
| BB% | 8.2% | 7.4% |
| K% | 23.4% | 21.6% |
| wOBA | .362 | .375 |
| wRC+ | 130 | 145 |
| WAR | 3.9 | 3.1 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Ty France |
|---|---|---|
| G | 403 | 965 |
| PA | 1,735 | 3,809 |
| H | 445 | 906 |
| 2B | 91 | 181 |
| 3B | 8 | 6 |
| HR | 67 | 102 |
| RBI | 232 | 436 |
| BB | 116 | 241 |
| SO | 376 | 708 |
| SB | 66 | 4 |
| AVG | .278 | .267 |
| SLG | .471 | .414 |
| WAR | 9.7 | 10.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

