Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Michael Helman

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 8.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Michael Helman TEX

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Michael Helman
G	155	12
PA	697	35
H	167	5
HR	44	1
RBI	105	2
SB	37	0
AVG	.277	.167
OBP	.369	.235
SLG	.571	.300
OPS	.941	.535
ISO	.294	.133
BB%	11.2%	2.9%
K%	26.1%	17.1%
wOBA	.401	.241
wRC+	156	47
WAR	8.2	-0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Michael Helman
G	441	53
PA	1,773	155
H	401	31
2B	79	8
3B	18	1
HR	85	6
RBI	248	22
BB	131	8
SO	442	30
SB	101	4
AVG	.254	.223
SLG	.488	.424
WAR	13.1	0.6

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Michael Helman’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Michael Helman vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.