DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Brooks Raley vs JoJo Romero

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticBrooks RaleyJoJo Romero
G6155
GS00
IP52.256.1
W53
SO5154
ERA3.253.04
FIP3.963.97
WHIP1.271.21
K/98.78.6
BB/93.42.9
FIP−9595
WAR0.40.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticBrooks RaleyJoJo Romero
G157
GS00
IP13.18.0
W02
SV00
SO1511
BB91
ERA4.721.13
WHIP1.500.50
K/910.112.4
BB/96.11.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticBrooks RaleyJoJo Romero
G318252
GS50
IP301.0249.0
W1418
L1814
SV1312
SO329237
BB11089
ERA3.773.43
WHIP1.181.22
K/99.88.6
BB/93.33.2
HR/90.90.9
WAR3.72.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.