Head to head · Career batting

Xander Bogaerts vs Bryce Harper

In 2026 Bryce Harper has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Xander Bogaerts SD

Bryce Harper PHI

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Bryce Harper
G	1,810	1,946
PA	7,675	8,358
H	1,942	1,956
2B	402	433
3B	19	27
HR	210	392
RBI	895	1,138
BB	670	1,212
SO	1,379	1,802
SB	148	159
AVG	.283	.279
SLG	.438	.516
WAR	50.1	63.4

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Bryce Harper
G	153	161
PA	606	693
H	120	155
HR	13	29
RBI	57	87
SB	22	7
AVG	.231	.269
OBP	.332	.380
SLG	.344	.485
OPS	.676	.865
ISO	.113	.217
BB%	12.7%	15.4%
K%	18.0%	21.4%
wOBA	.309	.378
wRC+	97	136
WAR	2.9	4.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Bryce Harper
G	60	60
PA	242	263
H	51	60
HR	7	18
RBI	23	36
BB	23	38
SO	49	61
SB	1	8
AVG	.235	.271
OBP	.306	.382
SLG	.387	.593
OPS	.693	.974

Xander Bogaerts’s full profile →Bryce Harper’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Xander Bogaerts vs

Bryce Harper vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.