DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Jacob deGrom vs Drew Rasmussen

In 2026 Drew Rasmussen has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticJacob deGromDrew Rasmussen
G3130
GS3130
IP162.2172.0
W1116
SO201174
ERA4.202.67
FIP3.122.82
WHIP1.140.91
K/911.19.1
BB/92.51.7
FIP−7567
WAR3.94.8

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticJacob deGromDrew Rasmussen
G58
GS56
IP31.033.1
W42
SV00
SO3736
BB105
ERA2.902.70
WHIP1.160.99
K/910.79.7
BB/92.91.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticJacob deGromDrew Rasmussen
G279160
GS279111
IP1,702.1632.2
W10746
L7622
SV02
SO2,052602
BB391151
ERA2.732.83
WHIP1.001.02
K/910.88.6
BB/92.12.1
HR/90.90.8
WAR47.214.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.