2026 season · rankings

2026 MLB Pitching Leaders

59 players qualified at 118.4 innings pitched, ranked by dbWAR. Every column sorts across the full qualified set — not just the rows shown — and the whole table downloads as Parquet.

Season2026 2025 2024TableBatting Pitching

RoleLeaguePool

Who

59 of 59 qualifiedDownload Parquet

#
1	Jacob Misiorowski	24	22	22	133.0	11	5	0	204	1.76	2.17	0.74	13.8	38.3%	19.8%	6.0%	34.6%	52	4.3
2	Dylan Cease	31	21	21	126.1	7	5	0	184	2.28	2.20	1.04	13.1	34.9%	16.2%	10.3%	26.1%	53	4.0
3	Cam Schlittler	25	25	25	146.2	10	6	0	182	2.21	2.60	0.93	11.2	28.6%	15.2%	5.4%	26.1%	62	4.0
4	Cristopher Sánchez	30	24	24	149.2	15	4	0	174	2.65	2.69	1.22	10.5	32.8%	16.5%	5.6%	22.2%	64	4.0
5	Chris Sale	37	21	21	123.0	12	7	0	151	2.20	2.40	1.02	11.0	30.7%	15.4%	5.7%	24.9%	58	3.7
6	Jesús Luzardo	29	24	24	143.2	10	5	0	176	3.32	2.83	1.14	11.0	31.8%	14.8%	7.4%	22.3%	68	3.6
7	Paul Skenes	24	24	24	129.2	9	10	0	162	3.96	2.91	1.12	11.2	28.9%	14.8%	6.8%	23.7%	70	3.1
8	Drew Rasmussen	31	22	22	124.1	11	5	0	130	2.75	2.93	0.91	9.4	25.6%	12.9%	4.5%	22.3%	70	3.0
9	Parker Messick	26	23	23	136.2	9	6	0	136	2.57	3.19	1.04	9.0	25.6%	12.4%	7.0%	18.1%	76	2.9
10	Gavin Williams	27	24	24	144.2	11	6	0	185	3.55	3.42	1.04	11.5	31.2%	15.6%	7.2%	25.1%	82	2.7
11	Logan Webb	30	21	21	133.0	7	7	0	103	3.59	3.27	1.08	7.0	20.5%	9.8%	5.9%	13.2%	78	2.7
12	Bryan Woo	26	22	22	127.1	8	8	0	127	4.31	3.20	1.12	9.0	25.1%	13.3%	5.2%	19.1%	77	2.7
13	Shane Baz	27	23	23	136.1	4	11	0	120	3.76	3.36	1.32	7.9	22.1%	10.8%	7.9%	12.8%	80	2.6
14	Yoshinobu Yamamoto	28	21	21	139.1	11	7	0	127	2.65	3.44	0.89	8.2	25.8%	12.7%	6.0%	17.8%	82	2.5
15	Chase Burns	23	22	22	124.0	13	2	0	143	2.61	3.28	1.12	10.4	31.7%	15.6%	9.2%	19.3%	79	2.5
16	Sandy Alcantara	31	25	25	163.2	13	6	0	128	3.52	3.77	1.17	7.0	21.9%	11.2%	6.2%	12.8%	90	2.4
17	Jacob deGrom	38	22	22	118.2	8	7	0	144	3.87	3.28	1.13	10.9	33.3%	17.2%	6.2%	23.5%	79	2.4
18	Sean Burke	27	23	19	128.2	7	6	0	144	3.08	3.36	1.12	10.1	25.6%	12.5%	7.4%	20.0%	80	2.4
19	Logan Gilbert	29	23	23	139.1	8	7	0	145	3.42	3.57	1.00	9.4	29.9%	15.3%	5.8%	20.6%	86	2.3
20	Joe Ryan	30	23	23	125.2	6	8	0	138	3.65	3.41	1.14	9.9	25.5%	12.8%	5.2%	21.2%	82	2.3
21	Kevin Gausman	35	24	24	134.1	6	10	0	131	4.29	3.53	1.26	8.8	27.0%	13.6%	6.5%	16.6%	85	2.3
22	Nolan McLean	25	23	23	130.2	8	7	0	156	3.51	3.49	1.16	10.7	25.4%	11.1%	8.8%	19.7%	84	2.3
23	Reid Detmers	27	23	23	129.0	3	8	0	150	4.12	3.47	1.10	10.5	28.8%	14.1%	7.4%	20.9%	83	2.3
24	Davis Martin	29	23	23	123.0	9	6	0	108	4.17	3.49	1.33	7.9	23.9%	11.7%	7.3%	13.5%	83	2.2
25	Landen Roupp	28	23	23	123.2	7	11	0	123	4.22	3.52	1.29	9.0	25.3%	10.9%	10.9%	12.6%	84	2.1
26	Cade Cavalli	28	25	25	128.2	9	5	0	141	3.57	3.60	1.30	9.9	25.3%	12.1%	7.1%	18.5%	86	2.1
27	Braxton Ashcraft	27	23	23	132.1	11	5	0	145	4.08	3.65	1.16	9.9	26.2%	13.7%	5.9%	20.7%	87	2.1
28	Sonny Gray	37	21	21	119.2	14	2	0	106	2.78	3.52	1.15	8.0	23.2%	11.0%	6.6%	15.3%	84	2.1
29	George Kirby	28	22	22	132.0	8	9	0	112	3.68	3.67	1.27	7.6	22.2%	11.6%	5.2%	15.5%	88	2.1
30	Eduardo Rodriguez	33	24	24	143.1	11	4	0	101	2.70	3.84	1.23	6.3	20.6%	9.8%	8.0%	9.2%	92	2.0
31	Ryan Weathers	27	22	22	121.0	5	7	0	132	3.79	3.65	1.22	9.8	27.4%	12.5%	6.8%	19.5%	87	1.9
32	MacKenzie Gore	27	24	24	128.2	6	9	0	140	4.55	3.76	1.24	9.8	25.6%	12.7%	8.6%	17.0%	90	1.9
33	Andre Pallante	28	22	22	124.0	12	6	0	90	3.63	3.72	1.22	6.5	21.7%	9.8%	7.2%	10.3%	89	1.9
34	José Soriano	28	23	23	127.2	9	6	0	130	3.24	3.78	1.26	9.2	31.6%	14.7%	11.3%	13.2%	90	1.8
35	Noah Cameron	27	22	21	123.2	6	8	0	116	4.37	3.73	1.29	8.4	25.7%	12.3%	7.6%	14.4%	89	1.8
36	Taj Bradley	25	23	23	131.2	9	4	0	148	3.76	3.84	1.25	10.1	26.3%	12.4%	9.9%	16.7%	92	1.8
37	Emerson Hancock	27	22	22	121.0	6	7	0	111	3.35	3.73	1.12	8.3	23.2%	12.0%	6.1%	16.5%	89	1.8
38	Kyle Bradish	30	23	23	127.0	7	11	0	121	3.69	3.86	1.34	8.6	24.8%	11.2%	10.1%	12.5%	92	1.7
39	Michael Wacha	35	23	23	144.0	5	8	0	112	3.44	4.02	1.15	7.0	21.2%	10.2%	7.0%	12.1%	96	1.7
40	Nick Martinez	36	22	22	129.0	11	3	0	73	2.65	4.00	1.10	5.1	17.5%	8.9%	3.9%	10.2%	96	1.5
41	Keider Montero	26	25	19	122.1	8	7	1	86	3.38	3.87	1.01	6.3	19.2%	9.3%	5.7%	11.8%	93	1.5
42	Joey Cantillo	27	25	25	119.2	8	7	0	132	3.91	3.96	1.48	9.9	30.5%	13.7%	10.7%	14.6%	95	1.5
43	Framber Valdez	33	23	23	127.1	7	7	0	103	4.17	4.04	1.37	7.3	20.7%	9.7%	8.1%	10.4%	97	1.5
44	Michael King	31	24	24	136.1	7	8	0	120	3.37	4.17	1.17	7.9	25.7%	11.9%	9.8%	11.6%	100	1.4
45	Foster Griffin	31	23	23	133.1	12	4	0	122	3.31	4.20	1.11	8.2	24.3%	11.8%	5.9%	16.5%	101	1.3
46	Seth Lugo	37	24	24	134.2	5	7	0	104	4.41	4.25	1.37	7.0	18.5%	8.5%	8.0%	10.1%	102	1.2
47	Justin Wrobleski	26	20	19	120.1	11	4	0	94	3.44	4.13	1.11	7.0	19.4%	9.8%	5.5%	13.6%	99	1.2
48	Nathan Eovaldi	36	22	22	132.2	10	9	0	137	4.21	4.26	1.21	9.3	30.5%	15.9%	5.8%	18.9%	102	1.2
49	Michael McGreevy	26	23	23	126.0	4	9	0	85	3.64	4.25	1.22	6.1	18.7%	8.5%	6.2%	10.3%	102	1.2
50	J.T. Ginn	27	24	21	121.1	8	6	0	107	3.41	4.22	1.21	7.9	27.4%	12.5%	10.4%	10.6%	101	1.1

Reading this table

FIP estimates what a pitcher's ERA would be given only the outcomes they control directly — strikeouts, walks, hit batters and home runs. FIP− indexes that against the league, so 100 is average and lower is better. dbWAR is our own open implementation, not fWAR or bWAR. See the full derivation →