DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Scott Barlow vs Sean Reynolds

In 2025 Scott Barlow has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticScott BarlowSean Reynolds
G7519
GS11
IP68.127.0
W60
SO7525
ERA4.215.33
FIP4.705.43
WHIP1.391.37
K/99.98.3
BB/95.95.7
FIP−113131
WAR-0.0-0.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticScott BarlowSean Reynolds
G1—
GS0—
IP1.2—
W0—
SV0—
SO4—
BB0—
ERA0.00—
WHIP0.00—
K/921.6—
BB/90.0—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticScott BarlowSean Reynolds
G47628
GS11
IP488.238.0
W310
L241
SV610
SO56546
BB22822
ERA3.794.03
WHIP1.291.37
K/910.410.9
BB/94.25.2
HR/90.90.9
WAR5.80.2

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.