DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Chris Bassitt vs Mike Burrows

In 2026 Chris Bassitt has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticChris BassittMike Burrows
G2018
GS1817
IP102.094.2
W94
SO7475
ERA4.595.99
FIP4.315.64
WHIP1.551.55
K/96.57.1
BB/93.43.3
FIP−103135
WAR1.0-0.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticChris BassittMike Burrows
G10—
GS3—
IP23.2—
W1—
SV0—
SO21—
BB6—
ERA3.04—
WHIP1.14—
K/98.0—
BB/92.3—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticChris BassittMike Burrows
G25242
GS23636
IP1,380.2194.0
W927
L7013
SV00
SO1,265174
BB44769
ERA3.714.92
WHIP1.271.40
K/98.28.1
BB/92.93.2
HR/91.01.6
WAR19.20.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.