Head to head · 2026 pitching

Mike Burrows vs Jeffrey Springs

In 2026 Mike Burrows has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Mike Burrows HOU

Jeffrey Springs ATH

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mike Burrows	Jeffrey Springs
G	18	29
GS	17	29
IP	94.2	142.2
W	4	4
SO	75	112
ERA	5.99	6.18
FIP	5.64	6.03
WHIP	1.55	1.46
K/9	7.1	7.1
BB/9	3.3	3.6
FIP−	135	144
WAR	-0.5	-0.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Mike Burrows	Jeffrey Springs
G	42	206
GS	36	96
IP	194.0	627.1
W	7	38
L	13	37
SV	0	2
SO	174	609
BB	69	215
ERA	4.92	4.22
WHIP	1.40	1.29
K/9	8.1	8.7
BB/9	3.2	3.1
HR/9	1.6	1.5
WAR	0.6	5.0

Mike Burrows’s full profile →Jeffrey Springs’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mike Burrows vs

Jeffrey Springs vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.