Head to head · 2026 pitching

AJ Smith-Shawver vs Jeffrey Springs

In 2026 AJ Smith-Shawver has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

AJ Smith-Shawver ATL

Jeffrey Springs ATH

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	AJ Smith-Shawver	Jeffrey Springs
G	9	29
GS	5	29
IP	31.1	142.2
W	0	4
SO	27	112
ERA	6.61	6.18
FIP	6.01	6.03
WHIP	1.53	1.46
K/9	7.8	7.1
BB/9	4.6	3.6
FIP−	144	144
WAR	-0.4	-0.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	AJ Smith-Shawver	Jeffrey Springs
G	25	206
GS	20	96
IP	105.1	627.1
W	4	38
L	5	37
SV	0	2
SO	93	609
BB	50	215
ERA	4.61	4.22
WHIP	1.37	1.29
K/9	7.9	8.7
BB/9	4.3	3.1
HR/9	1.5	1.5
WAR	0.1	5.0

AJ Smith-Shawver’s full profile →Jeffrey Springs’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

AJ Smith-Shawver vs

Jeffrey Springs vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.