DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

AJ Smith-Shawver vs José Soriano

In 2026 José Soriano has been worth 2.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticAJ Smith-ShawverJosé Soriano
G932
GS532
IP31.1177.1
W012
SO27169
ERA6.613.91
FIP6.013.90
WHIP1.531.29
K/97.88.6
BB/94.63.7
FIP−14493
WAR-0.42.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticAJ Smith-ShawverJosé Soriano
G3—
GS1—
IP6.2—
W0—
SV0—
SO6—
BB3—
ERA12.15—
WHIP1.95—
K/98.1—
BB/94.0—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticAJ Smith-ShawverJosé Soriano
G25123
GS2083
IP105.1501.1
W429
L529
SV00
SO93474
BB50219
ERA4.613.90
WHIP1.371.31
K/97.98.5
BB/94.33.9
HR/91.50.8
WAR0.17.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.