Head to head · 2026 NLCS batting

Mookie Betts vs William Contreras

In 2026 William Contreras has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLCS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 4-0 over the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Mookie Betts LAD

William Contreras MIL

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLCS.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	William Contreras
G	4	4
PA	18	17
H	3	5
HR	0	1
RBI	0	3
BB	3	3
SO	2	5
SB	0	0
AVG	.200	.357
OBP	.333	.471
SLG	.200	.643
OPS	.533	1.113

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	William Contreras
G	99	31
PA	455	127
H	98	33
HR	8	5
RBI	42	14
BB	56	12
SO	67	24
SB	16	1
AVG	.250	.287
OBP	.343	.354
SLG	.383	.452
OPS	.726	.807

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	William Contreras
G	123	147
PA	528	640
H	123	153
HR	23	18
RBI	69	94
SB	2	1
AVG	.257	.270
OBP	.326	.341
SLG	.454	.417
OPS	.780	.758
ISO	.197	.147
BB%	8.9%	9.5%
K%	11.0%	14.7%
wOBA	.340	.332
wRC+	115	109
WAR	3.1	3.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	William Contreras
G	1,646	744
PA	7,464	3,160
H	1,890	755
2B	419	149
3B	41	6
HR	314	103
RBI	982	409
BB	783	344
SO	982	641
SB	198	24
AVG	.288	.272
SLG	.508	.442
WAR	58.8	21.6

Mookie Betts’s full profile →William Contreras’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mookie Betts vs

William Contreras vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.