DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Clay Holmes vs David Peterson

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.9 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticClay HolmesDavid Peterson
G1832
GS1823
IP101.1148.1
W69
SO78137
ERA3.294.79
FIP3.643.97
WHIP1.191.50
K/96.98.3
BB/93.73.9
FIP−8795
WAR1.91.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticClay HolmesDavid Peterson
G198
GS01
IP20.016.0
W31
SV01
SO2011
BB78
ERA1.352.81
WHIP0.901.56
K/99.06.2
BB/93.14.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticClay HolmesDavid Peterson
G362163
GS53138
IP604.1771.0
W4246
L3838
SV741
SO567751
BB261327
ERA3.594.25
WHIP1.281.40
K/98.48.8
BB/93.93.8
HR/90.60.9
WAR9.010.7

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.