DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Carlos Rodón vs Michael Wacha

In 2026 Michael Wacha has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticCarlos RodónMichael Wacha
G1632
GS1632
IP84.1200.2
W79
SO91158
ERA2.673.32
FIP3.454.38
WHIP1.061.11
K/99.77.1
BB/94.12.4
FIP−82105
WAR1.82.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticCarlos RodónMichael Wacha
G810
GS78
IP28.246.2
W14
SV00
SO3647
BB1020
ERA7.535.21
WHIP1.571.35
K/911.39.1
BB/93.13.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticCarlos RodónMichael Wacha
G247341
GS242320
IP1,366.11,828.0
W100120
L7585
SV00
SO1,5001,574
BB515557
ERA3.673.83
WHIP1.211.26
K/99.97.7
BB/93.42.7
HR/91.11.1
WAR21.524.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.