DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Cristopher Sánchez vs Michael Wacha

In 2026 Cristopher Sánchez has been worth 3.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticCristopher SánchezMichael Wacha
G3332
GS3332
IP207.0200.2
W189
SO231158
ERA2.913.32
FIP2.804.38
WHIP1.201.11
K/910.07.1
BB/92.02.4
FIP−67105
WAR6.12.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticCristopher SánchezMichael Wacha
G510
GS58
IP26.046.2
W04
SV00
SO2547
BB1020
ERA3.125.21
WHIP1.231.35
K/98.79.1
BB/93.53.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticCristopher SánchezMichael Wacha
G137341
GS118320
IP742.21,828.0
W48120
L2885
SV10
SO7401,574
BB173557
ERA3.153.83
WHIP1.171.26
K/99.07.7
BB/92.12.7
HR/90.81.1
WAR18.824.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.