DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Cristopher Sánchez vs Ranger Suarez

In 2026 Cristopher Sánchez has been worth 2.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticCristopher SánchezRanger Suarez
G3328
GS3328
IP207.0148.1
W188
SO231140
ERA2.913.22
FIP2.803.16
WHIP1.201.19
K/910.08.5
BB/92.02.8
FIP−6776
WAR6.13.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticCristopher SánchezRanger Suarez
G511
GS58
IP26.042.2
W04
SV01
SO2544
BB1013
ERA3.121.48
WHIP1.231.05
K/98.79.3
BB/93.52.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticCristopher SánchezRanger Suarez
G137215
GS118147
IP742.2910.1
W4861
L2842
SV14
SO740845
BB173286
ERA3.153.35
WHIP1.171.26
K/99.08.4
BB/92.12.8
HR/90.80.8
WAR18.817.9

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.