Head to head · 2026 pitching

Shane McClanahan vs Ranger Suarez

In 2026 Ranger Suarez has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Shane McClanahan TB

Ranger Suarez BOS

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Shane McClanahan	Ranger Suarez
G	24	28
GS	24	28
IP	118.0	148.1
W	10	8
SO	106	140
ERA	3.36	3.22
FIP	3.50	3.16
WHIP	1.12	1.19
K/9	8.1	8.5
BB/9	3.0	2.8
FIP−	84	76
WAR	2.4	3.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Shane McClanahan	Ranger Suarez
G	99	215
GS	98	147
IP	522.2	910.1
W	43	61
L	23	42
SV	0	4
SO	562	845
BB	155	286
ERA	3.10	3.35
WHIP	1.11	1.26
K/9	9.7	8.4
BB/9	2.7	2.8
HR/9	1.0	0.8
WAR	10.8	17.9

Shane McClanahan’s full profile →Ranger Suarez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Shane McClanahan vs

Ranger Suarez vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.