DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Ranger Suarez vs Logan Webb

In 2026 Ranger Suarez has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticRanger SuarezLogan Webb
G2827
GS2827
IP148.1160.2
W88
SO140134
ERA3.224.31
FIP3.163.46
WHIP1.191.17
K/98.57.5
BB/92.82.3
FIP−7683
WAR3.63.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticRanger SuarezLogan Webb
G112
GS82
IP42.214.2
W41
SV10
SO4417
BB131
ERA1.480.61
WHIP1.050.68
K/99.310.4
BB/92.70.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticRanger SuarezLogan Webb
G215207
GS147204
IP910.11,223.0
W6178
L4262
SV40
SO8451,128
BB286291
ERA3.353.50
WHIP1.261.19
K/98.48.3
BB/92.82.1
HR/90.80.6
WAR17.930.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.